“Troublemakers play…football” November 2006

This is a project about what happended when through a foofball match the fans of each decided except to see the match to be the troublemakers of a match.

“Troublemakers play…football”
Through years, the changes at all sections of the world happened and the results were the best. However, in one section the changes that they have done through years did not have effect in the problem. The section is the football and the problem is the troublemakers “that they play…football”.
All happened at October 29, 2006. It was Sunday and the fans of both teams were gathered in the Alcazar stadium to watch the football game Larissa-Paok. The football match started and until the twenty minutes of the game, the match was excellent. After the twenty minutes, take place there scenes of shame. The football fans of Paok they started to throw rockets and seats. After a few seconds the football fans of Larissa they done the same things. The football match played regular when the football fans of Paok broke the rails of the stadium, they past at the stand of “death zone” and they started the manhunt with the football fans of Larissa. All happened with the police tolerance. After eight minutes, the police officers stopped the manhunt of the football fans of both teams with tear-gas. The troublemakers removed from the “death zone” and the football match stopped for thirty-three minutes because the atmosphere through the Alcazar it was bad. When the match started, again all things go well through the end.
I choose this event because I believe that it is very important for the following reasons. Firstly, every time that the football match is very important we have the troublemakers to do the same things inside and outside from the stadium. Secondly, every time after a match when we have this scenes the president or the vise president of each team he say that he will do this and that and finally he have not do anything for better days. Thirdly, we have a very big problem with security of the stadium because they are there to see and they cannot do anything when something bad happened inside of the stadium only the police officers can do something. Finally, the Ministry of Athletics every year they say that they will do some moves to have a better image inside the stadium but until now I did not see these moves.
For the same scenes of violence in the football match, I saw different approaches through television, internet, and the newspaper. The first approach is the through the television. At the night news of Antenna at first, the newscaster started the video of what happened this day in the football match and then some important people in Athens said their opinion about the scenes. After the video, we have a dialogue through the newscaster, the vise president of Olympiacos, or the president of Super League and the representative of police officers. Through this conversation, they discuss general things like why happened this every time, which must pay for this situation and what they can in the following months. However, I believe the result it was nothing and they did not discuss what they could do now.
In the second approach, we have the Internet media. Through this approach, I can say that they said exactly what happened in the stadium and we have some pictures with troublemakers do badly things in the stadium. Off course, I can see that they write some scraps for the conversation from the television. Finally, we have the opinions from the coaches of both teams and they wrote about an accident that happened on October 26, 1986 through the same football match Larissa-Paok.
The finally approach is through newspaper. They write about what happened exactly, the time that the “war” started and off course why these things happened. Nevertheless, he wrote the statements of two important people, he wrote his opinion and put the pictures from the scenes of violence. I believe that the best approach is from the television for the following reasons. Firstly, they saw the video of what happened this day for the visual opinion. Secondly, we have the conversation through the newscaster and the two people that they have some connection with scenes of violence. Through this conversation, we can understand the reasons of why happened there and to think if they believe what they said and if they will do something in the future for better days.
Although the analysis through these three media it was exactly what happened some things missed from the story there. Let’s write the scenes from the beginning. The football match began at 16:45 o’clock. After twenty minutes the football match stopped when the football fans of Paok broke the rails and they past at the stand of “death zone”. After this move, they started a manhunt with the football fans of Larissa. Finally, the police officers stopped the “war” throw these two teams but the destruction had happened with many damages in the stadium. After the analysis of these scenes, I will write the opinions of two coaches and some football players. The conclusion will be better if we can find the statements from two or three police officers that they were inside when the “war” started and tell us their view from the scenes that all people in the world saw in the night.
Finally, the conclusion of what happened in this football match is that firstly it was bad for the history of football these scenes. Secondly, I believe that they will not do anything for these scenes anyone because they do not want to do something. Finally, some day in the future nobody will want to come in a football match because they will be afraid of what bad things will happen this day.